research

Democrats’ Filibuster Hypocrisy

Democrats Don’t Have The Votes For Their Election Takeover Legislation, So Now They’re Prepared To End The Filibuster, Something They Repeatedly Said They Opposed


IN AN ATTEMPT TO “PASS LITERALLY ANYTHING,” DEMOCRATS ARE NOW READY TO EVISCERATE THE FILIBUSTER

  • As Biden’s signature “Build Back Broke” legislation sputters in the Senate, far-left Democrats are pivoting to an attempt to upend Senate rules by eliminating the filibuster to eviscerate election integrity, part of a desperate “attempt to pass literally anything.”
  • Tomorrow, Biden will likely speak on the Democrats’ attempt to end the filibuster, which White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said he now endorses.
  • After years of defending the filibuster to preserve “democracy,” Chuck Schumer and Senate Democrats are ready to destroy it to pass their radical agenda.
  • Democrats’ attempt to eliminate the filibuster has nothing to do with “voting rights.”
    • As their own past statements show, Democrats want to change the rules because they don’t have the votes to pass their radical legislation.

BIDEN AND KAMALA HARRIS REPEATEDLY DEFENDED THE FILIBUSTER

ACCORDING TO SCHUMER, ELIMINATING THE FILIBUSTER WOULD BE “DOOMSDAY FOR DEMOCRACY”

  • Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) was an advocate of the filibuster for decades:
    • In April 2017, Schumer said he wanted to “protect” the filibuster because without it “the Senate becomes a majoritarian institution,” and concluded that “no Senator would like to see this happen.”
    • In January 2017, Schumer said he wished Democrats hadn’t triggered the “nuclear option” in 2013 for lower court nominees.
    • In May 2005, Schumer defended the filibuster as a tool to promote bipartisanship and give a voice to the minority.
    • In March 2005, Schumer claimed that it would be a “doomsday for democracy” if the Senate changed its rules on the filibuster and that he would “stand in [the] way” of those who want to eliminate the filibuster.
    • In 2003, Schumer defended the filibuster as a way to bring “balance” to the Senate and slammed attempts to “change the rules.”
  • Schumer now defends eliminating the filibuster by claiming that former Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) – a Senate “traditionalist” – supported this, however Byrd never supported the effort to remove the filibuster.
    • In 2005, Byrd said that “the opponents of the filibuster” want to “change the rules in the middle of the game to get their own way,” and added that “delay, deliberation, and debate” is the “American way for all of us who love our country.”

MORE THAN THREE DOZEN SENATE DEMOCRATS PREVIOUSLY WARNED AGAINST ELIMINATING THE FILIBUSTER

GOP Loading